Indiana University

National Sports Journalism Center

Based at IUPUI with programs at IU Bloomington SPORTSJOURNALISM.org

Our Voices

Perfect Super Sunday storm — or, snowpocalypse — caps memorable NFL television season

By most accounts, Sunday’s Super Bowl couldn’t have been planned better if it was scripted by the minds behind CBS’ Survivor.

An upstart, Cinderella-story New Orleans Saints facing off against Super Bowl veteran Indianapolis Colts. A year of steady, substantial growth for NFL broadcasts, sparked by standout performances from veteran stars such as Brett Favre and the Colts’ Peyton Manning.

A crackling game that was competitive until the last quarter, complete with a quarterback shootout and crafty coaching moves (did Sean Peyton say they actually went over that onside kick play during open practice?)

And a surprise “snowpocalypse” blizzard parking everyone in the mid-Atlantic area indoors, in front of their TV sets, on Super Bowl weekend.

No wonder the game telecast Sunday emerged as U.S. TV’s most-watched program ever, outrating the hallowed 1983 finale of M*A*S*H by nearly 1-million viewers to pull 106.5-million pairs of eyeballs to CBS’ broadcast.

And now that a Super Bowl officially stands as American TV viewers’ all-time favorite broadcast ever, there’s just one question left:

What does it all mean?

“The NFL is the biggest entertainment property in the United States,” said Neil Pilson, a sports media consultant and former head of CBS Sports. “There may be dozens of entertainment shows, but the value of sports is that it’s totally unique…The fact that sports is a gathering place for attractive audiences is even more true now than 20 years ago – because people have so many more options.”

As Pilson admits, it is a little silly to try comparing the world of 1983 scripted television to the modern day. Even though there are exponentially more entertainment choices for TV viewers – indicating that Sunday’s Super Bowl beat long odds snaring such a large crowd — there also are many more people in the country and many more homes with televisions.

But it’s tough to escape the notion of a corner turned on Sunday; the moment when, looking back, sports broadcasting, television and the NFL was never quite the same as it was before.

Here are a few lessons learned from my side of the ottoman:

That old saw about watching the Super Bowl just for the commercials needs to go away for good: Each year, it seems the actual game has gotten better, while the hallowed commercials used to pull in fair-weather football fans have gotten more predictable, more vulgar and more desperate.

(By the end of the commercial where everyone was speaking through an auto tuner, I wanted to hunt down the guy who invented the gizmo and sacrifice him to the Super Bowl gods myself).

This year, the conventional wisdom about Super Bowls – as blowout game made entertaining only by the spectacle – was turned on its head. Even the most talked-about ad before the game – a head fake of a commercial by Focus on the Family and Tim Tebow that counted on breathless press reports to insinuate an anti-abortion message CBS likely kept out of its actual ad copy – turned out to be a gauzy trifle unworthy of the controversy.

Put it this way; my wife and family started the evening watching the commercials and ended it watching the game.

The NFL better work out its looming contract fights between players and owners: Sunday’s game provided an eloquent argument for maintaining the sport’s profit-sharing status quo; a team from a city where citizens were dying in its stadium five years ago grew competitive enough to stop a quarterback developing an almost unstoppable reputation.

The end result was an outcome that served the institution of professional football best: an unpredictable, exciting, emotional capper to a season lurching from the thrill of Favre’s return to the cold chill of Manning’s defeat.

Why upset that applecart just to make a few rich team owners even richer?

If this Super Bowl can’t revive the flagging TV advertising market, maybe nothing will: CBS still seemed to struggle with advertising in the big game, despite seeing NBC present what was then the most-watched Super Bowl ever in 2009 (indeed, CBS this year also set a record for the amount of time devoted to commercials – with 48 minutes given over to advertisements, according to the research firm Kantar Media).

This has been a turnaround from the way things have often worked for the TV business in past years. Before the recession really decimated media, broadcasters could argue that TV shows drawing fewer viewers still had value as the biggest platforms in a shrinking television universe.

But that argument wasn’t enough to keep longtime Super Bowl players like Fed Ex, Pepsi and General Motors in the game. “The Super Bowl has been a big example of ad rates not going up, despite big viewership,” said Robert Seidman of the TV ratings Web site TVBytheNumbers.com. “But if the economy stays flat and the ad market stays flat, Fox (who gets the Super Bowl in 2011) could be a bigger winner.”

The sports world better savor this football season, because it’s hard to imagine the stars aligning like this again: The NFL saw an amazing confluence of events unite to make this year’s Super Bowl a superior spectacle – including Favre’s emergence as a figure reviled as much as admired; several teams enjoying undefeated seasons for a good while; a crushing recession that made cheap televised entertainment more attractive to potential viewers and the weather.

After watching the way NFL games boosted ESPN’s ratings and provided a rare bright spot on fourth-place NBC’s schedule, Pilson noted that broadcaster gain a lot from featuring football games, even when the costs for such broadcasts exceed the advertising revenue.

“I always said it was a mistake to look at just the four corners of a sports property – whether the ad revenue balances out the fees,” he said. “As a broadcaster, you’re a stronger business with the NFL. Because those attractive audiences are even harder to get.”

Seidman had a simpler take on it all. “The big winner here is probably the sports fans,” he said. “For three years running we’ve gotten really good (Super Bowl) games.”

Eric Deggans is TV and Media Critic for the St. Petersburg Times and a 1990 graduate of the Indiana University School of Journalism. His work has also appeared in the Washington Post, Village Voice, VIBE magazine, Chicago Tribune, Detroit Free Press, Chicago Sun-Times and many other publications. He also writes a blog on media, The Feed, at www.blogs.tampabay.com/media.
Tools: | permalink |

Leave a Reply

about us

Center News

H.G. “Buzz” Bissinger discusses Vanity Fair article, the “true” Tiger Woods

Mar 11, 2010 | 1:13 a.m.

A man stands at the final hole of a golf course, a green jacket resting snuggly over his shoulders. He is asked a question. Being a family man, he responds that his family is the most important thing to him. But under the jacket lies the truth, the real image, the sex addict – the true Tiger Woods. H.G. ‘Buzz’ Bissinger never spoke with Woods before writing his piece in February’s Vanity Fair on the fall of the world’s greatest athlete. In fact, Bissinger never talked with Woods in his life. But, he knew the image that he saw and the deception that lay beneath it.

Wallace Renfro: Profitability no indicator of importance of college athletics programs

Mar 10, 2010 | 2:24 p.m.

As Wallace Renfro sees it, there are some misconceptions about big-time collegiate athletics. One of the biggest: That most big-time programs are highly profitable. Renfro, NCAA vice president and senior adviser, said Wednesday the reality is far different, and that in 2008, only 25 NCAA programs generated enough revenue to cover expenses. Moreover, he said just 18 did so regularly over a five-year period. Renfro, speaking at an Investigating the Business of College Athletics workshop hosted by the Indiana University School of Journalism’s National Sports Journalism Center and the Associated Press Sports Editors, said the statistic is notable enough. But he said what’s most notable is the misconception that being an expense rather than a profit source makes athletics unique in the collegiate environment.

Links

Resources

Our Voices

Eric Deggans

Focus on off-field goings on places more pressure on star athletes — and on those who cover them

Mar 9, 2010

Years ago, former Meet the Press host Marvin Kalb started one of his many books confessing about the biggest story he never covered. While working as a CBS News correspondent in 1963, Kalb had the misfortune to walk into a private elevator at the same time as a shapely young lady under escort by Secret Service agents, presumably for a – ahem – private meeting with then-President of the United States, John F. Kennedy. One hammerlocked takedown and fifty years later, Kalb never discovered who the woman was – surprised only by his immediate and almost reflexive decision not to do any more reporting on the matter.

Jason Fry

The Case of the Missing Scoop

Mar 8, 2010

In the digital world, sportswriters don’t have to wait for the next day’s paper to break news. They can take a half-hour to write a blog post or a story for the Web, a minute to help an editor craft a headline, or a few seconds to share the news with their Twitter followers. And sports fans learn information not just by visiting news organizations’ Web sites, but by receiving emails, tweets and status updates written by their fellow fans. News has never spread more quickly or in so many different ways. But the ability to break news so quickly has robbed that news of much of its competitive value. Scoops were once jealously guarded with an eye on tomorrow’s newsstand – the goal was a day on which you had a story your competitors didn’t, and a second day on which your competitors had to acknowledge through gritted teeth that you’d had it first. But that game is disappearing because of the Web. Web publishing reduced the life expectancy of most scoops to hours. Twitter has now reduced it to minutes.

Dave Kindred

More than an act of seduction . . . a promise of what’s to come

Mar 5, 2010

Great leads don’t let you out of the house. “Death is delivered pink.” First four words of a story written by Seth Wickersham for ESPN The Magazine. Had me at pink. Cancel my appointments, Ms. Thistlebottom. Gotta read Wickersham.

The Buzz

Mar 9, 2010Erin Andrews “won’t be there to console Tim Tebow” on draft day

"As we know, ESPN’s Erin Andrews will be part of this year’s Dancing With The Stars and, according to ESPN, her appearance on the show [...]

Mar 8, 2010Wall Street Journal beefing up sports coverage with beat writers?

"We hear that the WSJ is on a quest to beef up its sports coverage, and that will include hiring beat writers for the Mets, [...]

more of The Buzz »