Oh, to be 21 and doing it all for the first time . . .
Dave Kindred |
April 22, 2010 8:01 a.m.
![]() |
No, it’s not.
It’s the most fun a kid can have.
If the kid grew up transfixed by sports and media – thinking of Will Leitch, thinking of Erin Andrews – what could be more fun than a career that actually pays you to be what you’d pay to be?
But cynics rise on their hind legs and howl at the mention of a "career." Why would anyone believe there’s a future in sports journalism?
The better question is, How could you not believe it?
There is more sports news than ever and an audience hungry for that news. Warren Buffett, who knows things about making money, once said, "Nobody ever built an audience without making money from that audience." Exactly how everyone will make good-old-days money has yet to be determined, but, in my complete faith in the capitalistic system, I believe people of the Buffett entrepreneurial stripe will figure out a way to get filthy rich. Then they’ll pay us pennies and we’ll be happy as long as there’s relish for the press box hot dogs.
Anyway, I did some reporting on this subject after seeing a 2007 survey by Penn State’s John Curley Center for Sports Journalism. The survey reported that 155 universities offered at least one sports media course. The list included the traditional stalwarts, Missouri, Northwestern, Syracuse, Columbia, as well as schools such as Marist, Southern California, Maryland, Bradley, Boston University, Utica, Eastern Illinois, and Oklahoma State.
Two major sports journalism initiatives began in 2009. First – and you know this because you’re on its website — Indiana University established the National Sports Journalism Center. Based at the Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis campus, the program immediately enrolled 107 students. IUPUI this fall will offer a master’s degree program in sports journalism. Second, the University of Texas at Austin created the Texas Program for Sports and Media.
"Sports is a microcosm of life – with the volume turned up," said Steven Ungerleider, co-chair of the Texas program’s advisory board and consultant to the U.S. and International Olympic committees. (Borrowing the "volume" line from the wonderful sportswriter, Mark Whicker of the Orange County Register.) "It involves virtually all of us, as athletes, coaches, spectators. It’s integral to teaching ethics, standards, and principles that touch every aspect of our lives."
Of the many reasons a man would want to be 21 again, number four or five on my list would be today’s full palate of journalistic choices. When I was 21, a reporter/writer interested in sports could work for a newspaper or magazine – end of story. Today’s students have newspapers and magazines (for a while, anyway) along with hundreds of outlets from the big boys at ESPN.com, AOL’s Fanhouse, Yahoo! Sports, and CBSSports.com to newspaper websites, blogs, and niche blogs reporting on every aspect of SportsWorld. Today’s 20somethings see sports journalists on television, hear them on radio, read their blogs, follow them on Twitter, friend them on Facebook.
"Sports journalism isn’t dying, it’s transforming," said Tim Franklin, once the editor of The Baltimore Sun and now director of the NSJC. "When I meet with students, they’re excited about the future. They will have a different career path than we had. But when they look around, they don’t see the abyss. They see a changing, but dynamic, landscape. . . . It’s absolutely exploding on the Web, on mobile devices, and on cable. Independent sports blogs are estimated to have brought in several million in ad revenue last year. There are now more than 50 regional sports networks, with all the major sports leagues, teams and conferences building out their digital operations."
The best news I hear is that today’s students want what students have always wanted: lessons from the past that will get them ready for the future. To them, it doesn’t really matter if that future is in newsprint or iPad pixels; maybe they’ll shoot video, maybe they’ll write SEO-smart blog posts. But they’re in classrooms to learn the most important stuff, "the nuts and bolts" – to quote Malcom Moran of Penn State.
Moran left a 29-year career as a sportswriter to run Penn State’s Curley program. He recalls taking students on a tour of Major League Baseball’s dot-com headquarters. There they were surrounded by 21st century media- production gadgets. "If you’re over, say, 26," Moran said, "you probably don’t have much experience with this stuff. But students today have grown up in much more technologically-savvy way. The assumption is they have mastered, or are mastering, these new tools. So they’re excited."
Still, an MLB producer said that the new tools of the trade – he called them "the toys" – run second to the basic building blocks of journalism. "When they’re looking at interns or entry-level candidates," Moran said, "their emphasis is still on the ability to tell a story."
At Stanford, another reformed sportswriter, Gary Pomerantz, fuses the past with the present. "I not only acknowledge the different forms of new media," he said, "I incorporate them into what we do." His class assignments have included video projects and, last month, everyone tweeting from a Cardinal basketball game.
After 28 years as The Washington Post’s sports editor, George Solomon teaches at the University of Maryland. He calls it "the responsibility of journalism schools" to prepare students for careers different from those of even a decade ago.
"But those careers," he said, "should be as rewarding and satisfying, with standards in keeping with those set by giants of the past such as Red Smith, Shirley Povich, Jim Murray, and Sam Lacy. If our students ask, ‘Who are those guys?’ it’s our job to tell them."
Lillian Carter, the mother of President Jimmy Carter, was nearly 90 years old when she said she would give $10,000 "if I could read ‘To Kill a Mockingbird’ for the first time." Meaning she’d read it a hundred times, each time thrilling but never the same as the first time. And that’s another good reason for a guy to be 21 again. To be in a sports journalism class and, for the first time, read Dan Jenkins.
Dave Kindred’s next book will be "Morning Miracle," an inside-the-newsroom account of two years in the life of The Washington Post. Now a contributing writer at Golf Digest, Kindred is a Red Smith Award winner and member of the National Sportscasters and Sportswriters Association Hall of Fame. He can be reached at inkstained1@aol.com. He can be followed at Twitter.com/DaveKindred and facebook.com/people/Dave-Kindred/509353295.













Solomon is right when he points out that these new sportswriting jobs need to be as rewarding and satisfying as those jobs from the past. While agree that young people now have a wealth of new opportunities in the area of sportswriting, I’m concerned that the majority of the new jobs aren’t particularly good “careers” in the classic sense. Many organizations are getting by with freelancers, part-timers or contract writers. I’m not sure the number of solid full-time, sports journalism jobs has increased all that much.
You point out that independent sports blogs bring in millions of dollars in revenue. But how many independent sports bloggers can claim they do that on a full-time basis and can pay the bills?
Don’t get me wrong…I think there is great reason for optimism. But we’re not yet where we need to be.
I have great respect for Kindred, Solomon, Franklin, Moran and the other ex-scribes cited here. And nobody enjoyed reading Dan Jenkins more than I did. But this is hooey, pretending that a tidal wave of blogs and Websites – many of them nonpaying and too many of them incoherent – constitutes a “transformation.”
Going to journalism school so you can Tweet from a basketball game or generate “SEO-smart blog posts?” Please. That’s not a career; it’s a tactic.
There was a time when these same talented guys sat around hotel bars and argued about who could write and who could not. That was why we did it, some better than others. To pretend otherwise is depressing.
Steve Daley
I don’t think I can improve upon Steve Daley’s excellent post, except to say that anyone who refers to writers as “scribes” needs to look up the word and think again.
Someone simply doing something again and again does not constitute a career, no matter how much people want to insist that Twitter is the wave of the future. A career means more than performing a task. A career should include professional development; a chance for upward mobility if desired; pay raises for good performance; an assurance of steady work.
Today’s newspapers provide few of these things. They make people take furloughs. They have cut many of the management jobs that allowed people to move up in an organization.
Some people need a reality check — fast.
Dave –
If you were starting today, you wouldn’t have Ali.
Another Ali is not possible.
I got a Master’s degree in print/web journalism – sports concentration from Boston University not long ago. I am closer to 31 than 21 and am living this dream. I have gotten extremely lucky to actually have a job on a real beat covering a professional team with a real news organization but I am the exception rather than the rule. The “careers” in sports journalism will not exist for most of the students (or even my fellow classmates who got Master’s degrees in any type of journalism) will be few and far between. It is the nature of the state of the business right now that jobs are scarce and revenues spread thin precisely because of the hundreds of sports blogs making millions of dollars, not because of them.
I like you, Mr. Kindred, I do, but you are stuck a step behind. There are plenty of opportunities to write about sports, just not a ton of them where you can actually get paid to the point where you can pay your bills. I think that if you started again as a 21-year-old aspiring sports journalist and was actually in the position that young journalism students are in right now, you would have a different attitude. I see it often — people try to break into the industry but just do not have the opportunities to make a real life of it. I am probably considered one of the most successful people to come out of my program in recent years and for me it has been as much about creating luck with drive and talent as being genuinely lucky, sometimes to the misfortune of others (which was not my fault but I benefitted).
Yes, I can and do Tweet a game. I generate newsy blog posts, sidebars and columns. I freelance for low paying and non-paying websites and blogs. I know how to shoot and edit video and audio and can put it to use if called upon. I have a career as a sports journalist ahead of me and it will be an painstaking process to get to the point where I can pay rent, let alone anything else, from being a sports journalist. My advice to the 21-year-olds is to think of yourself as an actor — you will probably work in the field a little but otherwise you are known as a “waiter.” So, Mr. Kindred, I guess my bottom line is that, yes, there are a ton of opportunities to be a sports journalist but no, there are and won’t be a lot of opportunities to start a career in the business.
Keep preaching, Dave.
Today’s young, aspiring journalists don’t understand how good they have it. Technology is going to make them rich.
I’m writing about this subject again this week. Send me an e-mail. Let’s talk.